From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b16c9883f36bc904,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Nicolas Brunot Subject: WinNT ADA compilers comparison Date: 2000/07/20 Message-ID: <3976C68A.12386D00@cadwin.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 648543350 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp6.proxad.net 964085356 212.27.50.23 (Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:29:16 CEST) Organization: Guest of ProXad - France MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:29:16 CEST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-07-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: We saw several messages from people comparing behavior of different ADA compilers But usually this concerns executable size or performance, or why one doesn't accept code accepted by the others. Have somebody made comparison between different compilers for Win NT (Gnat, Objectada, Rational, Janus, etc ...) concerning - compile time - bind and link time - accept projects of more than 500 000 lines and several hundred source files ADA code without problem The annoucement of gnat 3.13 said that it would accept Microsoft linker and objects. Does anybody know if this is an option or if gnat 3.12 linker is no longer supported in 3.13 ? (We noticed poor performance concerning link time for Microsoft linker when a great number of objects are involved, is there a regression concerning link time between 3.12 and 3.13 ?) Thank you for any information you have. Nicolas BRUNOT