From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63ceef1cf4561e32 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Stanley R. Allen" Subject: Re: Customer balks at Ada -- any hope? Date: 2000/07/18 Message-ID: <39749211.1A6ADC0A@raytheon.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 647849417 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8l01s4$gnr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39748F35.72CBC45A@averstar.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-07-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Tucker Taft wrote: > > Another important point is that good programmers can learn new languages > quickly, and Ada compilers provide excellent "training wheels" because > of their abundant compile-time error checking. > This is a positive factor in some project manager's minds concerning the long-term maintenance issues. The typical project has high skills (analysts and contract-rate programmers) at the front end and lower skills (college grads) at the back end. Because the language catches so many problems up front, the less skilled developers/maintainers are able to be more productive and introduce fewer problems during maintenance. -- Stanley Allen mailto:Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com