From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d07b700201ae95,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Nicolas Brunot Subject: list of Windows available ADA compilers ? Date: 2000/07/12 Message-ID: <396C9757.4EE325A8@cadwin.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 645523178 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp2.proxad.net 963417693 212.27.44.60 (Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:01:33 CEST) Organization: Guest of ProXad - France MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:01:33 CEST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-07-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Does anybody knows how many ADA95 compilers can seriously be taken in account to develop under Windows NT ? - Aonix Objectada - Gnat - ? Who knows about a serious project developped with another one, if it exists ? We worry about the absence of competition in this field, and its possible consequences in the future. ADA83 compilers can also be listed (Alsys Activada, others ?) Thanks for any information.