From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,166b432bf64e65ad,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-31 17:34:50 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!barrnet.net!rational.com!kdm From: kdm@puppy.rational.com (Kent Mitchell) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rational Subsystems? Date: 31 Oct 1994 23:36:37 GMT Organization: Rational Software Corporation Message-ID: <393v25$1qu@rational.rational.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: puppy.rational.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: 1994-10-31T23:36:37+00:00 List-Id: Simtel20 Transfer (HARBAUGH@ROO.FIT.EDU) wrote: : Maybe I missed the answer to my question. I'll ask again : in such a way that a simple yes or no answer will suffice. : Do Rational Subsystems carry with them their own means of : resource allocation and control? I'm not exactly sure by what you mean when you say "resource allocation and control" but I'd be glad to answer any question if you elaborate a little more. -- Kent Mitchell | One possible reason that things aren't Technical Consultant | going according to plan is ..... Rational Software Corporation | that there never *was* a plan!