From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a2c7f6cbdb72aa16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Geoff Bull Subject: Re: "proprietary", was Re: ada on linux Date: 2000/06/05 Message-ID: <393B554F.43C369C4@research.canon.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 631174140 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8hf5uh$6nf$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@research.canon.com.au X-Trace: cass.research.canon.com.au 960189726 18109 203.12.174.227 (5 Jun 2000 07:22:06 GMT) Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jun 2000 07:22:06 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-06-05T07:22:06+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@bix.com wrote: > While legal, adding significant value to one's > proprietary product by copying/including something BSDed, without its > author's permission, is usually considered unethical. On what do you base this assertion ??? There is absolutely nothing to suggest this in the BSD license.