From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e384729507492509
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-31 09:12:33 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!ncohen
From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada in Australia (was Ada ad in Embedded Systems Programming
               stinks)
Date: 31 Oct 1994 17:12:33 GMT
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3938i1$jt4@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
References: <9410311033.AA06566@eurocontrol.de>
Reply-To: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: rios8.watson.ibm.com
Date: 1994-10-31T17:12:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9410311033.AA06566@eurocontrol.de>, Bob Wells #402
<wel@EUROCONTROL.DE> writes: 

|> I'm sure that these boxes must have been for the old Oberon class subs and
|> not the new Collins class subs.

What? Submarines programmed using Oberon classes?  (I guess that's what
they mean by "sub classes".)

--
Norman H. Cohen    ncohen@watson.ibm.com