From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e376d32d2036a816 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Jerry van Dijk" Subject: Re: More GUI Date: 2000/05/31 Message-ID: <39356e2c_4@news2.prserv.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 629586888 References: <8h2j3v$r2p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net X-Trace: 31 May 2000 20:55:24 GMT, 139.92.232.166 Organization: * JerryWare * X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: "Jerry van Dijk" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > > Also stretch things a little farther into the Windows realm and find > some > > way of incorporating OCX components into the application, find a way > to do > > this (without crashing minutes after the inclusion of an OCX > component) and > > you are on your way. That will do for a start. > > This probably won't be done as far as GtkAda is concerned. Our main goal > is to > be portable accross plateforms, at least everywhere ACT and ACT-Europe > have > ported GNAT. Having too many OS-specific features makes things harder to > port... True, but for those people that develop for the Win32 environment only, there is no reason not to use OCX components. Using David Botton's GNATCOM, allows you to both use COM, ActiveX, OCX components from Ada, or to even write new ones. And, of course, I should put in the remark that COM technology is not NT specific per se. Jerry.