From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.121.142 with SMTP id z136mr4698614itc.36.1510241805946;
        Thu, 09 Nov 2017 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.14.201 with SMTP id 67mr247765otj.4.1510241805843; Thu,
 09 Nov 2017 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!186no494975itu.0!news-out.google.com!x87ni1011ita.0!nntp.google.com!l196no489814itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ou14r2$49s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83c6:b000:e052:61fc:5a53:d240;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83c6:b000:e052:61fc:5a53:d240
References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4lq7does.fsf@TheWorld.com> <otrr5u$1rqv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <wccd14so07t.fsf@TheWorld.com> <ou14r2$49s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <39330489-ec8b-481f-bcff-a5b7d1a2d8e3@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: some trivial questions?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:36:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1862
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3090984008
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48781
Date: 2017-11-09T07:36:45-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 09:49:40 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov:
> >> Yes. E.g. what if nested package instantiation would not imply "with"?
> >> Should the similar [flawed] logic apply here as to "use"?
> > 
> > I don't understand those questions.
> 
>     package Foo is new Bar;
>     use Foo; -- That must be illegal
> 
> Now the "right" way:
> 
>     package Foo is new Bar;
>     with Foo; -- For the sake of "showing dependencies"
>     use Foo;  -- That's right!

But that's weird.

declare
  package P is ... end P;
  with P;  -- You really want this? Bah!
  use P;