From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!chinet!nucsrl!gore
From: gore@nucsrl.UUCP (Jacob Gore)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Accept with parameters but no do-end?
Message-ID: <3930001@nucsrl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Nov-86 14:37:38 EST
Article-I.D.: nucsrl.3930001
Posted: Thu Nov  6 14:37:38 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Nov-86 05:31:27 EST
Organization: Northwestern Univ., Evanston IL
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>From ALRM 9.5, paragraph 21:

  "An accept statement need not have a sequence of statements even if the
   corresponding entry has parameters.

So, the following statement is legal:

   accept AN_ENTRY (A_PARM: A_TYPE);

Could somebody tell me why?  What would this be used for?  What's the scope of
A_PARM?

Jacob Gore
Northwestern University
Computer Science Research Lab
{ihnp4,chinet}!nucsrl!gore