From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f27bbe0678fdfc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Martin Dowie Subject: Re: huge executable?? - worry no more Date: 2000/05/16 Message-ID: <39213419.7DE30B4@gecm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 624024237 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <391E09C3.FA04871E@mailandnews.com> <9EET4.760$pN4.423580@news.pacbell.net> <3920DA5B.2F56@club-internet.fr> <8fpu0g$a3e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <392091E9.20999FBE@research.canon.com.au> <3920fbbd@rsl2.rslnet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 16 May 2000 12:40:55 GMT, stnp2927.stanmre.gecm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Now Ada 95 incompatibilities with Ada 93 has us discussing whether the > latter is obsolete. i should think Ada93 is one of the most obsolete languages i have ever heard of ;-)