From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Alfred Hilscher Subject: Re: Desirability of C++ Date: 2000/05/10 Message-ID: <39195B9A.CFDBC9F@icn.siemens.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 621546924 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <390D001C.7433140B@netwood.net> <20000507071636.16841.00001779@ng-fz1.aol.com> <8f4lso$1mn$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <3916FB39.A08359CD@netwood.net> <391892F3.1B9BB5AB@raytheon.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Siemens AG Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Stanley R. Allen" wrote: > > "E. Robert Tisdale" wrote: > > > > I'm sure that C++ programmers can see > > or at least ought to be able to see the value of Ada. > > What makes you so sure? Maybe some "C++ programmers" use only C++ because they are forced to do so :-)