From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c872b4c479fe6a9b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "DuckE" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: financial computations
Date: 2000/05/09
Message-ID: <3918be1c.0@news.pacifier.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 621377988
References: <391725AA.4F68ED72@gmx.de> <39182D26.F4FDB0F8@quadruscorp.com>
 <8f93qg$1g9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39182A7C.C1358EE2@easystreet.com>
 <8f9o7c$q3o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3918A193.9800E973@easystreet.com>
X-Trace: 9 May 2000 18:40:44 PST, 198.145.224.64
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Date: 2000-05-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> With 64-bit mantissae available in several programming languages,
> including Ada according to GNAT, if I know the rules, I can
> approximate this stuff for a million lifetimes before I lose
> a cent.  Realistically, I expect that when I do lose that penny
> there will be some character at hand who will point out the
> error and gloat without mercy. I would hate to deny him that
> pleasure.  It's like playing solitaire.  If I always did it
> according to the book, what would the kibitzers do?  How could
> I sustain my humility without at least one grievous error per
> eon?
>

I'm speaking out of my field, but I vaguely remember learning something
about this in college (more than 15 years ago).  As I recall obtaining the
"correct" answer in financial calculations has as much (or more) to do with
convention, than with precise mathematical results.

I wonder if there's a newsgroup alt.bean-counter.calculations?

;-)

SteveD