From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319049242a1d61c0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Christoph Seelhorst <christoph.seelhorst@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Ada and OS/2
Date: 2000/05/08
Message-ID: <391723D2.326623A9@gmx.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 620783653
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3911CE27.808923F9@mailandnews.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ewetel.net
X-Trace: ac1.ewetel.de 957814159 24332 212.6.78.153 (8 May 2000 19:29:19 GMT)
Organization: EWE TEL
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2000 19:29:19 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-08T19:29:19+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have checked the Ada market since quite some years, but I do not know
of any other OS/2 Ada compiler.
Years ago I tried the (then) Alsys Personal Ada for Windows, but it did
not cooperate with WinOS2.
So it seems that Gnat is our only choice, but what is bad with it??

Cheers, Christoph

David Dousette wrote:

> Are there any other options for an Ada 95 compiler for OS/2 besides
> GNAT?
>
> Thanks,
> David