From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ca464c92c72e0e9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: baysinger@earthlink.net Subject: Re: Ada grammar Date: 2000/05/08 Message-ID: <3916da40.4458290@news.earthlink.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 620686784 References: <07a73f60.478cecce@usw-ex0102-015.remarq.com> <8euivq$qso$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <004d942d.2e326cd2@usw-ex0104-026.remarq.com> <8f6cgt$vuq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 957799459 168.191.181.25 (Mon, 08 May 2000 08:24:19 PDT) Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 08:24:19 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert, ASIS would be great, but not all compiler vendors provide ASIS. One of the more popular (at least within Boeing) Ada compilers for embedded systems does not provide ASIS. Unless ASIS becomes universally available, tool vendors will need to providing their own parsing and analysis capability, or limit their potential customer base. On Mon, 08 May 2000 12:38:55 GMT, Robert Dewar wrote: >In article <004d942d.2e326cd2@usw-ex0104-026.remarq.com>, > bradders wrote: >> My company produces a UML based Real-time modelling tool. We >> generate and reverse engineer code for C, C++ and Java and >soon >> we will be supporting Ada 95. Basically I need to be able to >> Parse Ada code to build up a symbol table and populate a class >> model. > > >It seems like you would do much better to use ASIS for this >purpose, no? > > >Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ >Before you buy.