From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Stanley R. Allen" <Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Desirability of C++
Date: 2000/05/08
Message-ID: <3916FEC4.90721B0D@raytheon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 620744233
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <390D001C.7433140B@netwood.net>
 <20000507071636.16841.00001779@ng-fz1.aol.com>
 <8f4lso$1mn$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Richard D Riehle wrote:
> 
> Wishful thinking, I suppose.  C++ is not dead.  Java is not dead. Ada is
> dead.  Even COBOL and Fortran are not dead.  

Missing "not" at the end of line one?  Or an outpouring of despair?

-- 
Stanley Allen
mailto:Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com