From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f868292008c639ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen" Subject: Re: C vs. Ada - strings Date: 2000/05/06 Message-ID: <39139E12.C63F2872@online.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 619857045 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <390F0D93.F835FAD9@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> <8eons4$sqj4@ftp.kvaerner.com> <8es4gh$3ms$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@online.no X-Trace: news1.online.no 957586958 130.67.226.176 (Sat, 06 May 2000 06:22:38 MET DST) Organization: Jensen programvareutvikling MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 06:22:38 MET DST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > >Tarjei T. Jensen wrote: >> I'm not too keen on ada strings. I think the problem is that >> they do not work the way programmers want them to work. > > What would be more useful is to specifically say what "you" > would like to see. > I think we have covered that quite extensively in this and the "desirability of C++ thread. Greetings,