From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: Desirability of C++ Date: 2000/05/05 Message-ID: <391327A0.D8CA99C4@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 619714399 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <390DEC7F.9429C82C@online.no><390E2A20.B647D0D6@maths.unine.ch> <8em8mb$evd$1@wanadoo.fr><390EEF24.BD36AA24@maths.unine.ch> <8eonat$sqj3@ftp.kvaerner.com> <8eoo6v$ers$1@wanadoo.fr> <391060A6.7ABCDCFE@cadence.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 5 May 2000 21:57:21 +0100, mac13-32.unine.ch Organization: Maths - Uni =?iso-8859-1?Q?Neuch=E2tel?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Paul Graham: > [...] You can also write: > > if (StrIEqual(name1, name2)) { > ... > for case-insensitive comparisons. How do you compare strings > case-insensitively in Ada? By writing a routine like StrIEqual, in > which case you lose the notational ease of '='. In a non time-critical part, you can use the following solution: if To_upper(name1) = To_upper(name2) then ... - To_upper from Ada.Characters_handling (+/- correct spelled) _____________________________________________ Gautier -- http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/