From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4ce0116ed6e67d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Stanley R. Allen" <Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: X Motif in Gnat Ada Application
Date: 2000/05/02
Message-ID: <390F691F.4E0473BA@raytheon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 618484411
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <PfHP4.5158$Px3.143079@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <8enj57$2e8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> I don't know if its any better today, but back in the paleozoic era when
> I was doing Motif work, it was definitely *not* thread/task safe. If you
> wanted to use Motif with multitasking programs, you had to be sure that
> only one task actually made all the X/Motif calls; sort of a Motif server.
> 

My understanding is that "thread safety" was the major feature
which distinguished X11R6 -- the final revision of X.

-- 
Stanley Allen
mailto:Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com