From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c8e8f6fa5e81021f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Cam Hodge" Subject: Re: Looking for Information on Symbolized Search Trees Date: 2000/04/27 Message-ID: <39079182$0$21741@motown.iinet.net.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 616150149 References: <956391873.399710@karri.southwest.com.au> <8dsbn2$1v0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <956453655.636707@karri.southwest.com.au> <8dv0gd$ps1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <956500552.442995@karri.southwest.com.au> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Trace: news.iinet.net.au 956797314 21741 NGK4ef@203.59.85.242 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Correct. You would need to change the Procedure to Result : In Out Integer, but hey the assignemnt says that the specifications cannot change. > One quick question away from the above mentioned stuff, If I have a > procedure declaration such as > > procedure Test (Array1: in out array_type; > Result: out Integer) is > > if i want to call the procedure recursively from in itself then the value > for result that i may have already calculated will be of no use as result is > only being passed out and not in?? > > any help would be appreciated > > James > > > >