From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4bce46ddadaa9806 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Vincent Marciante Subject: Re: What is wrong here? (Generic and controlled types) Date: 2000/04/22 Message-ID: <39013702.6063@li.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 614209978 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38E871E6.8D9EBE71@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de> <8caebe$6us$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8cahmn$apq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38FFFDEE.431A@li.net> <8dqhkl$6vt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: nuq-read.news.verio.net 956380950 209.139.0.88 (Sat, 22 Apr 2000 05:22:30 GMT) Organization: Verio MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 05:22:30 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > > > > Both "package" and "library unit" are in the ARM's index. > > Well so is "library level", Sorry, must have been awake too long. > and if we are going to use technical > terms in the error messages we might as well use them > accurately. A library level package is definitely NOT the same > thing as a package that is a library unit, so your replacement > is inaccurate. I guess I need to correct my understanding of the term. Where (in addition to the ARM) is there an expanded description of this? I just searched deja and found the reference to John English's book. I'll find and check it first. (I guess that I remembered that "library level" was not in the index of many Ada books from this discussion but mistakenly "remembered" that the ARM was mentioned :(