From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b8748382fcfacc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: steve.folly@rdel.co.uk (Steve Folly)
Subject: Re: friend classes in ada95
Date: 2000/04/18
Message-ID: <38fc23c8.321562762@news.rrds.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 612605677
References: <38F6B617.34E216A7@emw.ericsson.se>
 <38F6D9F0.F0DE08E4@geocities.com> <8d7lqt$cgu$1@epos.tesco.net>
 <wcc8zygbioi.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@rdel.co.uk
X-Trace: rdel.co.uk 956048623 21969 172.16.115.146 (18 Apr 2000 09:03:43 GMT)
Organization: RDEL
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Apr 2000 09:03:43 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-18T09:03:43+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:12:45 GMT, Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com> did
clatter that keyboard and type:

>"Steve Folly" <steve.folly@mail.com> writes:
>
>> > package X.Y is
>> >     -- Cannot see X's private part
>> 
>> Not true - according to the LRM (I forget which section off the top of my
>> head) child package visibility rules are the same as if you had declared (in
>> this case) Y inside X at the end of it's private part after all other
>> declarations.
>
>If you look up that section, you'll have trouble finding it.  ;-)
>
>The visible part of a child cannot see the parent's private part,
>unless it's a private child.
>
>- Bob

I stand corrected :-(


Steve.