From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5de0d3d0d0685cbe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: using package GNAT.Traceback
Date: 2000/04/13
Message-ID: <38f5d0ef.0@silver.truman.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 610811826
References: <C01J4.377$ev4.340097@nnrp4.proxad.net>
 <8d2dan$202$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38f4cb4c.0@silver.truman.edu>
 <SseJ4.530$%H6.752697@nnrp4.proxad.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
X-Trace: news.more.net 955656383 150.243.160.9 (Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:06:23 CDT)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:06:23 CDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

My post wasn't meant to get an apology from you.  I was actually poking fun
at Dr. Dewar's question on whether or not you had read all the
documentation.  I was also suggesting that since GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic has
a comment that it is only supported on Sparc/Solaris and x86/Linux, the
package GNAT.Traceback should probably have a comment in it saying that it
requires a switch to be set.  Upon review of my post, I realise that this
was not clear so thus I am correcting myself.

-Chad R. Meiners

"Christophe Gouiran" <christophe@e-motive.com> wrote in message
news:SseJ4.530$%H6.752697@nnrp4.proxad.net...
> Thank you and I appologize, I didn't read the Gnat user's guide entirely.
>
>