From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5882b8e137d950f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Geoff Bull Subject: Re: DII COE bars Ada -> Java compilation Date: 2000/04/20 Message-ID: <38FF0AAA.EDCB4AC6@acenet.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 613584219 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38EB3482.971747E4@lmco.com> <8cjaqu$380$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <38fef687.78243137@news.gte.net> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@telstra.net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 956238673 203.35.118.1 (Thu, 20 Apr 2000 23:51:13 EST) Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 23:51:13 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Munck wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:48:11 GMT, Richard D Riehle > wrote: > > >The DII policy [makers] were probably coached by someone > > from Sun or Microsoft. > > Both are possible. Probably not Sun, because the Java Security FAQ explicitly states that using other languages will not affect security. see: http://java.sun.com/sfaq/#otherBytes