From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,758f1e01b86b6274
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch>
Subject: Re: Export instances of procedures
Date: 2000/04/20
Message-ID: <38FED802.9952EC51@maths.unine.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 613520262
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <38FCBA00.992AA7A2@maths.unine.ch> <8djpm3$qef$2@wanadoo.fr>
 <8djth8$du2$1@wanadoo.fr> <8dkjcq$skf$1@wanadoo.fr> <8dkt67$pp1$1@wanadoo.fr>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: 20 Apr 2000 12:12:18 +0100, mac13-32.unine.ch
Organization: Maths - Uni =?iso-8859-1?Q?Neuch=E2tel?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry:

> You are right but my point was that this was not possible with the *supplied
> code*
> sample. But as you point it is always possible to have this working but here
> the Program_DMA generic unit must be moved to the spec (or another spec
> package). But here you have a side effect. The generic unit is now visible
> to
> users ! Maybe there is a nice way to handle that with some child
> libraries...

You guessed well that the generic "Program_DMA" is rather of internal use!
Anyway in this context putting it into the spec. is not too dramatic : the full
DMA package (spec. & body) has now found its place inside another one.
The simple solution of putting the generic in the spec. had just not hit me...
Thank you (J.-P.) for the idea and debate!
The case appears in other pieces of code :-)

_____________________________________________
Gautier  --  http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/