From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5882b8e137d950f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Robert I. Eachus" Subject: Re: DII COE bars Ada -> Java compilation Date: 2000/04/19 Message-ID: <38FE43D7.D3A8BF7@earthlink.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 613359414 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38EB3482.971747E4@lmco.com> <8cjaqu$380$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <38fef687.78243137@news.gte.net> X-Accept-Language: en,pdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 956187616 63.24.55.244 (Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:40:16 PDT) Organization: The MITRE Corporation MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:40:16 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Munck wrote: > Both are possible. Note, however, that the ruling could have been > intended to be pro-Java, anti-Ada, or anti-C++. This introduces > a wide array of possible advocates of the rule both inside and > outside the DoD. Given what I know of DISA and the COE, my > bet would be MITRE. You may be out of date, but for that matter, so could I. However, given the current structure, I would suspect JPL or INRIA.