From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,56250291936154a0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Stanley R. Allen" Subject: Re: Where is the elusive jump command? Date: 2000/04/13 Message-ID: <38F60987.B2D9702A@raytheon.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 610762585 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38D771CA.D41AF9B5@port.ac.uk> <8bq7ku$mc8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38E0E723.C39C392@quadruscorp.com> <8brfm4$4uc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38E240D1.DB36C983@quadruscorp.com> <38E2333B.2109F2BB@lmtas.lmco.com> <8bu4ek$412$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8bul06$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <38E396E7.45941282@quadruscorp.com> <8c1tcr$dkp2@ftp.kvaerner.com> <38F4F1FF.568BB924@raytheon.com> <38F54084.DB9FDA31@Raytheon.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Samuel T. Harris" wrote: > > "Stanley R. Allen" wrote: > > > > > > Not necessarily. Fortran->Ada is probably simpler than Ada->Fortran. > > > > Well, having done this myself I have to say that Fortran -> Ada > (at least Fortran 77 to Ada 83) was a substantial undertaking :) > How much more substantial would it be to convert to Fortran an Ada program with tasking, dynamic memory allocation, exception handling, functions returning unconstrained arrays ... and that's just Ada 83. -- Stanley Allen mailto:Stanley_R_Allen-NR@raytheon.com