From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad84be6ce1cbae14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Rainer Aigner <aigner@newtec.de>
Subject: Re: Take controll of the assignment operator
Date: 2000/04/13
Message-ID: <38F58760.83EAEA88@newtec.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 610582455
References: <38F2FF84.C44AC279@newtec.de> <wccvh1oiuvz.fsf@world.std.com>
 <38F437C5.D525C847@newtec.de> <8d2h6m$6qj$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------CEE208D5794B26643CC2D081"
Organization: NewTec
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------CEE208D5794B26643CC2D081
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> In article <38F437C5.D525C847@newtec.de>,
>   Rainer Aigner <aigner@newtec.de> wrote:
> > And I want to make sure, that a read with the 8-bit type is
> > performed by a "load byte", and the 16-bit type by a "load
> > halfword" assembler statement.
> 
> There is absolutely NOTHING in the RM, or anywhere else that
> would imply it is appropriate to expect this usage of
> instructions, and there is nothing wrong in a compiler that
> does not follow this expectation, and there is no way to

That completle correct, and I got the problem.
My idea was, if I can overload all the other operators
and even can implement my own heap, and many more (and all by language),
maybe I have a chance to influence the assignment.
Regarding to the point, that my sw is in RISC Class 1 and code
coverage...
It would also be much less effort to validate the code. cause right now 
I have some 2000 line just with direct assembler. And it will be many
more.

Up to this point, I can live it, but couldn't it been that I just
doesn't saw
the right way?

> insist that the compiler follow this expectation.
> 
> If your code depends on this, then the ONLY legitimate way
> to achieve this is to write machine language insertions
> or instrinsics that generate the instructions you need.
> Any other solution is incorrect, and may cause significant
> difficulties in porting the application to another compiler
> or to another system.
Right now I writing code on 3 different plattforms, with 3 different
compilers.
The thing with porting to another system will be difficult for a TSAP
(Target Specific ADA Package).

> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
--------------CEE208D5794B26643CC2D081
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="aigner.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Rainer Aigner 
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="aigner.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Aigner;Rainer
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:NewTec GmbH;Software developer
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:aigner@newtec.de
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Rainer Aigner
end:vcard

--------------CEE208D5794B26643CC2D081--