From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00ff2b882a06fda X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Al Johnston Subject: Re: HELP: renames and enum values Date: 2000/04/11 Message-ID: <38F34758.EF19D072@mindspring.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 609688413 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38ECE0EB.4BD4A53E@mindspring.com> <38EE2019.4C91075D@Raytheon.com> <38EE494D.DDB9CE9@mindspring.com> <38F20A7C.3DCD5122@Raytheon.com> X-Accept-Language: en X-Server-Date: 11 Apr 2000 15:42:12 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-11T15:42:12+00:00 List-Id: > > > Sorry... I should have said it... "without using a USE"... > > and without referencing EU_AGETDsc... > > These seem bizare restrictions. Could you elaborate on the > context which is forcing such a straight-jacket upon you. I am to "smart" (I hope) to start this thread... the debate over using "use". And in this case I can avoid it. The code I am reworking has the same type declared in multiple places. I am reworking the code to get ride of them. Avoiding the use of use helps me catch the errors I make... leaving/using the use would mask many of the errors until a later change.