From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc050a66c3b5d87d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,86e8c626be2471ae X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public From: Geoff Bull Subject: Re: F9X twister & ADA (was: n-dim'l vectors) Date: 2000/04/11 Message-ID: <38F2C1DC.5538F9F0@research.canon.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 609433148 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8cctts$ujr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38EA0440.1ECBC158@ncep.noaa.gov> <38ED4ECA.ADB698C9@sdynamix.com> <38F28A85.53809F39@sdynamix.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@research.canon.com.au X-Trace: cass.research.canon.com.au 955433404 20016 203.12.174.227 (11 Apr 2000 06:10:04 GMT) Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2000 06:10:04 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-11T06:10:04+00:00 List-Id: James Giles wrote: > Not that Ada is inherently superior. They > did a lot of things badly too (their exception handling, for example). What don't you like about Ada exceptions? Cheers Geoff