From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00ff2b882a06fda X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Al Johnston Subject: Re: HELP: renames and enum values Date: 2000/04/07 Message-ID: <38EE494D.DDB9CE9@mindspring.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 608142268 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38ECE0EB.4BD4A53E@mindspring.com> <38EE2019.4C91075D@Raytheon.com> X-Accept-Language: en X-Server-Date: 7 Apr 2000 20:49:10 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-07T20:49:10+00:00 List-Id: Sorry... I should have said it... "without using a USE"... and without referencing EU_AGETDsc... I really cant make since of this behavior... I should be able to say something like sk_types.dsc.overrd0state_typ.override_off; What I really want here is a rename of a data type, which doesn't seem to be available in ada... I am trying to "isolate" one group of routines that use overrd0state_typ form another group of routines that use it... I know that is NOT subtypes are for, but they are the only thing (i have found so far) that might allow me to do this.... oh well.. So... any way to do this other than with a use/ref to original package?? thanks for the help... At least the language's behavior makes a little more since to me now. -al