From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63585ba5c5be8595 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Marc CHEVRIER Subject: Re: Ada to Motif bindings Date: 2000/04/05 Message-ID: <38EB67AE.812FD691@businessobjects.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 607128594 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38E8E8CE.81EC851F@mitre.org> <38EAC651.1DD94F40@home.com> <8cffvp$q0s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@businessobjects.com X-Trace: news.businessobjects.com 954954185 20772 10.2.5.215 (5 Apr 2000 17:03:05 GMT) Organization: Business Objects Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Apr 2000 17:03:05 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-05T17:03:05+00:00 List-Id: You can also try a pure Ada approach for your Motif programming. Have a look to http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/topgraphx Ted Dennison wrote: > > In article <38EAC651.1DD94F40@home.com>, > Glen Cornell wrote: > > You're entering a domain where not a lot of people naturally do their > > work. Most X programmers use C or C++ as their language of choice. > > You'll just get some slim pickin's, if you're looking for someone who > > *knows* Ada and Xlib/Xt/Motif. > > I wouldn't say that. I've don a fair bit of Ada/Motif work. I'd say that > in many ways Ada combined with UIL is a much better way to do GUI > development than C or C++ with Motif. > > -- > T.E.D. > > http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy.