From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4bce46ddadaa9806
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Alexander Boucke <alexb@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: What is wrong here? (Generic and controlled types)
Date: 2000/04/04
Message-ID: <38E9A380.2E850EFC@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 606453928
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <38E871E6.8D9EBE71@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>
 <8caebe$6us$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 954835840 5918 134.130.177.111 (4 Apr 2000
 08:10:40 GMT)
Organization: RWTH Aachen, Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet fuer Mechanik
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Apr 2000 08:10:40 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-04T08:10:40+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> The good news is that since this was just a test program, there's a
> decent chance you will never again need to instantiate a your generic in
> a procedure. If that's the case, just declare a package spec to be the
> instantiation of your generic, and you can go on your merry way.
> 

You are right, the future use will be inside of other packages... And it
works nicely, I just followed your advice to put the instantiation in a
package spec.

Thanks,

Alexander Boucke

-- 
"I try to write idiot proof code, but they keep making better idiots."

A. Stanley in comp.sys.sgi.admin