From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4a36b7df69d1af90 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: G Subject: JGNAT help puh-leeze Date: 2000/04/04 Message-ID: <38E93F14.BA4DA1CE@interact.net.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 606339061 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8bqd8g$sbs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c2613$hce$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c7fh4$25g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c92nl$nqn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8cak93$dtl$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@asiaonline.net X-Trace: news.interact.net.au 954810245 203.24.148.43 (Tue, 04 Apr 2000 11:04:05 EST) Organization: ... X-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 11:04:05 EST (news.interact.net.au) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 11:04:05 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I am still working at a novice level in all of this. However - I am wondering, after installing the JGNAT over my GNAT, I have problems running some examples because of an aborted installation of Borland's JBUILDER which has inserted itself into some of the path operations. It is not evident in my autoexec.bat file... so I can't trial the examples. Any advice ? Also - The JGNAT outputs class files. Ok, but why is it that after compiling the hello.adb file to hello.class that I can't run the class file with "java hello" at the command line prompt ? Thanks, Graeme Robert Dewar wrote: > In article , > "John Merryweather Cooper" wrote: > > Oh, I agree totally! I did read it. But I was STILL curious > > what it would do. So, I tried it. :) (What the ****, I have > > both versions installed . . > > .) I'm guilty of being "redundant," but I thought it was an > > important aspect to test. Unfortunately, I've seen way too > > much documentation that has little to do with reality or the > > current state of affairs with a particular piece of software. > > It's nice to have things confirmed. > > Indeed, it is often difficult to make sure documentation keeps > up with software. But the readme files are generally highly > accurate since they are prepared for specific releases. > > For the main GNAT documentation, we have found that it is > very helpful that the documentatin source is ASCII (texi) and > checked into the same repositories as the sources. This means > that developers can modify and update the documentation using > the same procedures as they use for the sources. This does not > of course guarantee that it gets done, but it is a very useful > step forward compared to situations where the documentation is > kept in a completely different form, with limited access by > specialized documentation folks. We used to keep our > documentation in Frame, which made it look a bit nicer, but > made if very hard to keep up to date. > > Robert Dewar > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- G.M. Wallace Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------- "They paved paradise, put up a parking lot." ~ Joni Mitchell