From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,56250291936154a0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "William B. Clodius" Subject: Re: Where is the elusive jump command? Date: 2000/03/30 Message-ID: <38E3BE85.790488C4@lanl.gov>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 604509157 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38D771CA.D41AF9B5@port.ac.uk> <8bq7ku$mc8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38E0E723.C39C392@quadruscorp.com> <8brfm4$4uc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38E240D1.DB36C983@quadruscorp.com> <38E2333B.2109F2BB@lmtas.lmco.com> <8bu4ek$412$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38E3490F.82EB4B32@maths.unine.ch> <38E36673.5C82463F@lmtas.lmco.com> <8c06dc$8q62@news.cis.okstate.edu> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@lanl.gov X-Trace: newshost.lanl.gov 954449540 11690 128.165.58.113 (30 Mar 2000 20:52:20 GMT) Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Mar 2000 20:52:20 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-03-30T20:52:20+00:00 List-Id: David Starner wrote: > > Implicit none is illegal in standard Fortran 77, though it's a common > extension. > While not part of the Fortran 77 standard it was part of MIL-STD 1753 (I hope I have the number right), which was issued shortly after the Fortran 77 standard. It is therefore a "standard" extension in the US, that anyone writing Fortran for the US military could and should consider as supported. Because of the importance of the military market, I don't know of any compilers in the US that didn't support it by the mid-80's.