From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f4d16c4ee371eb5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@icn.siemens.de>
Subject: Re: Why is it Called a Package?
Date: 2000/03/30
Message-ID: <38E357D3.870B61D2@icn.siemens.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 604325754
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <38DF7F38.8D656ABD@lmtas.lmco.com>
 <38DFB0BC.9FF72EFC@callnetuk.com> <8bpmte$482$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Siemens AG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



Jean-Marc Bourguet wrote:
> I find quite easy to use programming languages in which keywords are not
> in my mother language. As a matter of fact, it is perhaps easier, as

I prefer english keywords, too.  If I imagine a program written for
example in german (my nativ language) it looks for me more to be a joke:

W�hrend I > 0 tue
  I := I - 1;
Ende w�hrend;


What is the opinion of people with a different character set, e.g.
Chinese, Arabian, Russian ?