From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a02ecdd4cb0f0996 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Wes Groleau Subject: Re: Pragma Inline and its Effects of Compilation Dependencies. Date: 2000/03/22 Message-ID: <38D90027.9975BDB9@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 600923648 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8b64ul$jov$1@inputplus.demon.co.uk> <8b8gen$mko$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38D7CABA.A73F88C6@cadence.com> <38D7F4D8.1AE44625@maths.unine.ch> <8b94tg$9jt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en,es,fr,pt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 953745451 151.168.144.162 (Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:17:31 EST) Organization: Raytheon Company MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:17:31 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-03-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > .... the only way to do full inlining with the classical > library model is to delay inlining until binding, which is > a very heavy burden, since it means delaying much or even all > code generation till bind time. I don't quite follow. If object code has been generated within file xx.o for function XX.Func, what prevents a code generator, when it reaches Rec.Field := XX.Func (P, Q); from streamlining the preamble and parameter setup and result assignment, and copying the rest of the object code as is. Or do you mean something else by "full" inlining? -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau