From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Paul Graham <pgraham@cadence.com>
Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever!
Date: 2000/03/22
Message-ID: <38D8DFC2.778826FB@cadence.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 600873665
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <38D7B41D.B3494C6A@lmco.com> <8b8m2e$8201@news.cis.okstate.edu>
 <8b9fk3$l18$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Cadence Design Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

> Another big bunch are continue gotos. Ada lacks a continue
> statement, and thus this facility must be simulated with a goto
> as in ...

Why is there no 'continue' statement in Ada?  You've shown that the
function of 'continue' is desirable. 

Paul