From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a02ecdd4cb0f0996
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Paul Graham <pgraham@cadence.com>
Subject: Re: Pragma Inline and its Effects of Compilation Dependencies.
Date: 2000/03/21
Message-ID: <38D7CABA.A73F88C6@cadence.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 600523664
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <8b64ul$jov$1@inputplus.demon.co.uk> <8b8gen$mko$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Cadence Design Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

> One of the big advantages of the source based model used first
> by GNAT, and later by some (but not all) other Ada 95 compilers
> is that inlining can be done accurately.

Makes you wonder why the library-based method of compilation was used in
the
first place.  Perhaps the intent was to save compilation time by not
recompiling
package sources each time they are USEd in another unit.

Paul