From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0792820d2e409c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Scott Ingram <scott@silver.jhuapl.edu>
Subject: Re: Alsys Ada question
Date: 2000/03/08
Message-ID: <38C66DBA.7976047D@silver.jhuapl.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 594733660
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <38C53DCC.C89AE4BF@silver.jhuapl.edu>
 <_glx4.8055$YU2.118072@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@houston.jhuapl.edu
X-Trace: houston.jhuapl.edu 952528314 24514 128.244.80.107 (8 Mar 2000
 15:11:54 GMT)
Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, Laurel, MD, USA
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 2000 15:11:54 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-08T15:11:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ed Falis wrote:
> 
> The contents of that package can be easily replaced by Unsigned_8,
> Unsigned_16 and Unsigned_32 in any Ada 95 compiler.  The correspondence is
> Byte, Word and Dword from package Unsigned.

Ah, that was the paragraph I needed...since I wasn't sure of the
correlation between the Alsys Unsigned types and the Ada95 types.
 
> You could try contacting Aonix about the compiler.  As Richard suggested,
> Ada 95 is more likely the way to go.
> 
> - Ed Falis
> Former product manager for Alsys X86 products.

-- 
Scott Ingram
Sonar Processing and Analysis Laboratory
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory