From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a37fec0028a63ae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Tucker Taft Subject: Re: Britannica on Ada Date: 2000/03/07 Message-ID: <38C56B1B.86E0B821@averstar.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 594408988 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8a1afv$e5c$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8a34ca$n0a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@inmet2.burl.averstar.com X-Trace: inmet2.burl.averstar.com 952462108 14991 141.199.8.164 (7 Mar 2000 20:48:28 GMT) Organization: AverStar (formerly Intermetrics) Burlington, MA USA Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Mar 2000 20:48:28 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-03-07T20:48:28+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison wrote: > > In article <8a1afv$e5c$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, > jehamby@lightside.com wrote: > > > BTW, whatis.com has a much more flattering definition of Ada (complete > > with several different descriptions from different sources, including > > the Hacker's Dictionary, along with the comment that many "hackers" > > don't agree with that definition), here: > > Interesting that the two vendors mentioned are two of the smaller ones. [Green Hills and OCSystems are the two mentioned.] Actually, Green Hills is one of the bigger Ada vendors. In terms of Ada 95 sales, I suspect they are second only to Rational. Of course, it is a little hard to compare "sales" figures when comparing with GNAT ;-). > > -- > T.E.D. > > http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy. -- -Tucker Taft stt@averstar.com http://www.averstar.com/~stt/ Technical Director, Distributed IT Solutions (www.averstar.com/tools) AverStar (formerly Intermetrics, Inc.) Burlington, MA USA