From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b163da12c2d15f4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: David Gillon Subject: Ada and the 777 Date: 2000/02/11 Message-ID: <38A40349.785BDD52@gecm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 584521146 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 11 Feb 2000 12:41:00 GMT, rc3284.rochstr.gmav.gecm.com Organization: BAE SYSTEMS MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: After the disagreements in that F-22 thread last month as to whether the 777 used Ada, I happened across a fairly definitive overview yesterday -- an article in Crosstalk by Boeing's Manager for Embedded Software Engineering describing their experiences. In summary 70% of 777 LoC were Ada, with the rest getting a waiver, but the full article can be found at http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/1996/jan/Boein777.asp -- David Gillon