From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,77f5e85b95c6168a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: GNAT for Macintosh Date: 2000/02/07 Message-ID: <389EEA82.6D3FA3D7@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 582668057 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20000204073310.24976.00001287@ng-ci1.aol.com> <389E22C5.9929DC65@maths.unine.ch> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 7 Feb 2000 15:52:17 +0100, 130.125.13.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > > If Mac OS X (non-server) is not out how can one seriously port GNAT ? > Developers have long had access to Mac OS X. Interesting. Another question: which range of Macintoshes will be upgradable to Mac OS X? Every Power Mac or more recent machines? The underlying question is: for the next years, wouldn't be worth to develop a GNAT for Mac OS 8+ (the "Classic" one...) ? - Just curious... -- Gautier _____\\________________\_______\ http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/