From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa2cc518ef3b992c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Lionel Draghi Subject: Re: scripting/extension language for Ada (was : Re: tagged typesextensions) Date: 2000/02/05 Message-ID: <389BE32B.1F8E5525@free.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 581848924 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <389207CC.C16D80E8@averstar.com> <38971028.BB16D8A2@earthlink.net> <3899F757.FAE131B3@free.fr> X-Accept-Language: fr-FR, en, it Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net X-Trace: nnrp2.proxad.net 949740388 213.228.24.156 (Sat, 05 Feb 2000 09:46:28 CET) Organization: Guest of ProXad - France MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 09:46:28 CET Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Brian Rogoff wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, root wrote: > > Brian Rogoff wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > Dylan-over-Ada anyone? Yikes, that acronym is horrible :-) > > The most important progress is to have a readable and safe language. > > So why Dylan, Perl? Why not something close to Ada syntax? Each time i > > How dare you compare Dylan and Perl for readability! Shame on you! :-) Sorry, i am on a slippery slope: i chat on a language i don't even know. I begin to be alike usual Ada enemy! you are right : Shame on me! > > -- Brian -- ________________________________________________________________________ Lionel Draghi http://attac.org/