From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!sri-unix!sri-spam!ames!elroy!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!scgvaxd!trwrb!trwspf!dragon
From: dragon@trwspf.TRW.COM (Roger Vossler)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Assembly language (was: Re: Another 1.3 wish.)
Message-ID: <389@trwspf.TRW.COM>
Date: Tue, 25-Aug-87 02:04:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: trwspf.389
Posted: Tue Aug 25 02:04:34 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Aug-87 01:43:12 EDT
References: <8707190424.AA10158@cogsci.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: dragon@trwspf.UUCP (Roger Vossler)
Organization: TRW - Data Systems Lab., Redondo Beach, CA
Keywords: No affordable validated home Ada compilers.
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <2176@xanth.UUCP> kent@xanth.UUCP (Kent Paul Dolan) writes:
*The cheapest validated personal computer Ada compiler still
*porks in above $1000, last I heard.  (I've given up waiting, and
*ordered a Modula 2 compiler for personal use, $200 list.)  So, code
*written in Ada might as well be pseudocode, for all most of us care
*for our own use.

Although we are a large defense contractor and are using Ada, members of
my group have used Modula-2 very successfully on a number of efforts
internally. Modula-2 makes a very nice, small, cheap, fast, and powerful
subset of Ada, particularly, when we have to pay for it out of our own
pockets. 8-) Taxpayers may not be too concerned about how their money is
spent, but stockholders are less charitable.
-- 
-- Roger Vossler
   TRW, Bldg O2-1395, One Space Park, Redondo Beach, CA 90278
   BIX: rvossler      UseNet: dragon@trwspf.trw.com
   ATT: 213.535.2804          ....!sdcrdc!trwrb!trwspf!dragon