From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef01dc1d0a3a8bd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: Dummy Date: 2000/02/03 Message-ID: <38999F78.C17BAA7D@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 581096286 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <387b154a.3533365@newsread.albacom.net> <3898C380.BC01EC03@earthlink.net> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 3 Feb 2000 15:30:47 +0100, 130.125.13.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Java casts are always perfectly safe. Casts between object types are > akin to C++'s dynamic_cast, in that they are type-checked at runtime ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cultural questions: isn't it a redhibitory source of slowndowns ?! Is there a mean to make such type checking at compile time in Java ?... > and will fail if the cast is not valid. -- Gautier _____\\________________\_______\ http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/