From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a83c46b54bacb7f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: JOB:Sr. SW Engineers Wanted-Fortune 500 Co Date: 2000/02/01 Message-ID: <38962C05.4DF953C2@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 580110704 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3894A823.92EC75D1@bondtechnologies.com> <874b7r$mj9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 1 Feb 2000 00:41:23 +0100, 130.125.13.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > OK, I'm being a smartass, but I am making a valid point. > Having its software written in Ada was not enough to keep > the Ariane 5 from going off-course and being blown up. In > the same way, having the software of a pacemaker written > in C is not enough to force it to blow up. I would assume > that pacemaker software undergoes thorough critical-systems > development and testing regardless of what language it's > written in. OK, but in Ada, the pacemaker maybe will issue: "You've lost! CONSTRAINT_ERROR - Unhandled exception at line 3082. Symbolic stack dump follows". -- Gautier _____\\________________\_______\ http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/