From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c504b8163d90b768 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jon S Anthony Subject: Re: CORBA ORBs Date: 2000/01/20 Message-ID: <38876539.6220@synquiry.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 575392051 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <866v2q$u5h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: client 948397387 38.151.18.1 (Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:43:07 EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:43:07 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > communicating through CORBA. The ORB providers that we have looked at > can support only one of the ORB I/F in a single computer, that is, the > Ada, Java, and C++ ORB interfaces can not coexist in the same target > machine. Anyone know any ORBs which can? Huh? You mean in the same running image? Even that is probably not too hard. Certainly the following work just fine "coexisting on the same machine" and inter-operating with programs based on them (I know this for a fact because we've used them all and all together at various points): Ada : ORBExpress Common Lisp : ORBlink, CL ORB C++ : Mico and Omni ORB Java : JDK's ORB, JacORB, VisiBroker /Jon -- Jon Anthony Synquiry Technologies, Ltd. Belmont, MA 02478, 617.484.3383 "Nightmares - Ha! The way my life's been going lately, Who'd notice?" -- Londo Mollari