From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e33299387b9c9db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: Using ADA in pure DOS Date: 2000/01/19 Message-ID: <3885D7A9.5209EB60@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 574698545 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <089a47c5.84e1ded2@usw-ex0102-015.remarq.com> <864cst$tq3@news.dns.microsoft.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 19 Jan 2000 15:25:10 +0100, 130.125.13.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Try http://www.gnuada.org/dos.html. Does GNAT/DOS really fit for multitasking (a question for gnatlist) ? I feel that a bridge to DR-DOS' multitasker (http://www.lineo.com/products/drdos.html) or so would be necessary... Iirc there are small problems on chips without FPU... BTW we could synchronize with the other 'GNAT for DOS page'... http://members.xoom.com/gnatlist/dos.htm :-) > > Is there a solution for using ADA in pure DOS with multitasking > > capabilities ? Our budget are very limited (no ETS with 5000$) Take a look at Janus/Ada... http://www.rrsoftware.com/ -- Gautier _____\\________________\_______\ http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/