From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108abf,d3bcc180a8b0eea4 X-Google-Attributes: gid108abf,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3bcc180a8b0eea4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kdevlin@mpinet.net (K. Devlin) Subject: Re: [Fwd: F22 completes 11% of its Flight tests] Date: 2000/01/18 Message-ID: <3883b521.4798053@news.mpinet.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 574010667 References: <387C8859.621FA20B@netscape.net> <387CC1C0.4C57E34C@quadruscorp.com> <387CEE4A.3965@Ganymede.com> <387F8E50.11D27E14@quadruscorp.com> <85oclj$nbp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <387FCA73.3A61@Ganymede.com> <85ok6v$iee$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <3880CCC7.261957BC@quadruscorp.com> <388274ac.42926465@news.mpinet.net> <3882DC89.AB2831A9@no.spam.gecm.com> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,rec.aviation.military X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Date: 2000-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:48:13 -0800, "jtarver" wrote: > >Stuart Palin wrote in message >news:3882DC89.AB2831A9@no.spam.gecm.com... >> jtarver wrote: >> > K. Devlin wrote in message >> > news:388274ac.42926465@news.mpinet.net... >> >> >> >> > > I hope he doesn't fly on Boeing 777 A/C as they are as close to 100% >> > > Ada based as possible (see http://adaic.org/docs/flyers/boe-777.shtml) >> > >> > In fact Boeining studied using Ada and then rejected it along with the >ARPA >> > funding using the language would have provided. In order to fly on a >civil >> > airplane running under Ada you would have to fly on a 717. Of course I >only >> > built 777s; Bees love C. >> >> The 777 Flight Control Computer software is written Ada. > >My lead when I was at Boeing developed the FCC system for the 777 and claims >they chose to not use the Ada. Do you know Dave Mc Laughlin? > >John > > > Claims???? That doesnt seem to be a very definitive statement. If you were there why hedge? How 'bout proof?? Any documentation you can point us to?? kbd