From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8cca2e0315177d3b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Tucker Taft Subject: Re: Instantiating a generic formal procedure with an access procedure value Date: 2000/01/13 Message-ID: <387E2D6D.1CE5FD75@averstar.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572233983 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <84guh6$emh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3870E3F1.906FDFF4@averstar.com> <84rnbm$8jo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38725A42.2961CEFC@averstar.com> <84u97t$uut$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <85ifd2$bae$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <85jho4$5a9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@inmet2.burl.averstar.com X-Trace: inmet2.burl.averstar.com 947793261 11043 141.199.8.164 (13 Jan 2000 19:54:21 GMT) Organization: AverStar (formerly Intermetrics) Burlington, MA USA Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jan 2000 19:54:21 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-13T19:54:21+00:00 List-Id: Jeff Carter wrote: > ... > OK, Tucker Taft's favorite front end accepts the instantiation, but > GNAT does not. Now hopefully the language lawyers and compiler > implementers will answer (or argue) the question: Which is correct? The instantiation is certainly legal. The GNAT error message doesn't even make sense, so you can be pretty sure that it is just a GNAT bug. Send a report to the appropriate GNAT bug list. > -- > Jeff Carter -- -Tucker Taft stt@averstar.com http://www.averstar.com/~stt/ Technical Director, Distributed IT Solutions (www.averstar.com/tools) AverStar (formerly Intermetrics, Inc.) Burlington, MA USA